Canon 1265B001 Reviews, Best Prices, Compare
 |
Product: Canon 1265B001 Amazon Price: Too low to display Availability: In Stock |
Compare Prices on Canon 1265B001
After testing the Canon TX-1, this has been my experience:
PHOTO QUALITY: Favorable. Canon wisely uses in-camera noise reduction (blurring) lightly and preserves bewitching detail. On terminate magnification, single pixel detail is expose, which the Panasonic DMC-TZ3 that I compared blurred details into a gradient. Color saturation and disagreement are expedient. Focus is quick and good. Overall, expedient qualtiy unexcited pictures.
VIDEO QUALITY: Very righteous. Quality is roughly midway between DV and a dedicated HD camcorder. Though criticized by some for their spacious file sizes, Canon's Motion JPEG compression codec yield video that is of apt inequity, and friendly color saturation. I took video samples and re-compressed them using Canon's codec (included with their camera's software) and other codecs including MPEG2, QuickTime, and multiple other codecs from Adobe Premiere, and found that the Canon motion-JPEG, though theoretically not as efficient a compression plot, ended up with the best quality video, while other codecs of similar file size were more washed out. Another advantage of this compression map is that you can gather safe quality frame captures, as each frame is compressed individually. It's not perfect: unlike my dedicated HD camcorder, the TX-1's video has a vague "lustrous" execute, from the JPEG compression varying from frame to frame. Also, with provocative objects, the motion isn't quite as fluid with as with my dedicated HD camcorder. But for a combination still/video platform, the video of the TX-1 is remarkably top-notch. File sizes are enormous, but they will be with any high quality video.
ERGONOMICS: In my medium to exiguous hands, the camera is easy to possess. Some reviewers complained that they needed to employ their left hand to stabilize the camera, but I always believe cameras with two hands. This one can be held with one, but any camera will yield less blurry pictures if held with two hands. If you have enormous fingers, you may net this camera too shrimp.
CONVENIENCE: The LCD folds into the camera, and there is no optical viewfinder, so when the camera is closed, there is no vulnerable glass to scratch up on any side. And it is so diminutive that you can throw it in a pocket or bag or purse and pull it out for an unexpected spontaneous shot.
FLASH: I was fearful that the flash would be too under-powered. It is a aged flash. Unexpectedly, this turned out to be a trustworthy thing. I've noticed with past cameras that indoor flash pictures screamed "FLASH!" and were quick-witted with a thin gloomy shadow next to foreground objects from the flash. This weaker flash ironically ends up making more natural shots as it doesn't saturate the shot and some existing light adds to design a more sparkling recount. The flash is too customary to brightly light up a enormous dark room that you are shooting from a long distance, or if you zoom in under black conditions.
ZOOM: 10X zoom is really powerful; I can zoom in a lot more than I expected. The great image stabilization allows these zoomed in shots to not be blurred from camera motion.
LOW LIGHT: Like virtually all compact cameras today, the runt CCD does not get well in very gross light shots without flash. The TX-1 is no exception. Fuji cameras are known for better performance in extreme light, but currently don't have optical image stabilization. The image stabilization in the TX-1 (and other cameras with this feature) back a lot because you can exhaust powerful longer shutter speeds and obtain up for the tiny CCD.
PLAYBACK: It has been fun for me to amble the camera into my widescreen TV and glimpse the photos and video in a combined trek explain. That format is fun for the family and allows everyone to appreciate the memories without having to sit by a computer monitor or wait for prints.
PROBLEMS: The only thing I've not enjoyed is that the microscopic LCD makes it harder to peer detail in composing a shot, especially in radiant sunlight.
OVERALL: The TX-1 produces satisfactory quality aloof pictures, very apt 720p video, is little, not easily scratched, has a sizable zoom, large image stabilization, and will raze up being something you will want to toss into a pocket or bag and prefer a spontaneous, memorable moment. It is a rare camera that can represent both stills and video without one of them being useless. I'm very glad with it. I hope you luxuriate in whatever you determine on too!
Do not rob this camera if you are looking for either a broad camera or camcorder, choose it as the best micro image recording diagram available.
As you will fetch in other reviews, the camera part is average. What makes this camera stand out is the fact that it will do 1280 X 720, 30 frames PROGRESSIVE! This is simply fabulous since this camera is no larger than a box of cigarettes. It is not perfect though. There are few manual controls, e.g. no shutter rate or ISO control, however you do have control over locking ASE and Focus, as well as white balance. Some reviewers have complained about ergonomics, but a runt monopod or makeshift grip that attaches to the tripod mount will do the trick. I personally would have preferred a REC button in front of the camera. If I could also compose a couple of wishes, I would also ask for an external 1/8" stereo external microphone connector, as well as LANC control that could be feeble for zoom, focus, record/pause and conclude. Finally, grievous light levels are very noisy.
There are also concerns about battery power. I have been able to go an hour without a charge. Again, it is suggested to acquire an extra battery. If you really need to have this camera running continuously, prefer the external power adapter. If you need more remote power, consume one of those extra lithium ion external power packs that has an output of 3.5 volts and retrofit a coaxial lumber to fit the external power adapter.
Some reviewers are complaining about Canon using the Motion JPEG file format for video. Upright it is not the best compression format for making slight files, but the quality is better than most MPEG 4 or even MPEG 2 file formats. Plus, you fetch frame by frame editing. To compose up for the unpleasant compression, unbiased recall a larger card.
There are also some questions if this camera can befriend more than a four gigabyte SD card. Yes, but it will need to be a snappy SDHC card. This poses its contain problems because it is not backwards compatible with SD card readers so you will not be able to expend it with any card reader unless it specifically says it is compatible with SDHC. This is not too stout of a spot since the camera uses a standard mini USB female connector and XP, Vista, OS X observe it without additional software.
In my idea, this has been my respond to a stealth high definition documentary camera. I will acquire many uses for this camera in the upcoming months. Eye for my documentary "Gamer: The chronicles of Evanor" [...] to be released at the raze of the year. It will beget footage from this camera.
I gave it a four out of five stars for not adding an external microphone adapter, LANC control, and a few more manual controls. This would have garnered a perfect earn from me. I hope Canon is listening.
The TX1 is exactly what I'm looking for. In order of importance, I was looking for something (1) itsy-bitsy that (2) takes good/excellent video on (3) flash memory that will (4) work with my Mac and (5) can replace my point-and-shoot camera. I'm not particularly fond of taking video so I didn't want to recall a camcorder that only took video and was tremendous, or at least larger than the TX1. However, for those times that I do want to pick video, this is perfect, and the describe quality, imo, is gigantic. I can have it with me all the time because it's microscopic. It's not as dinky as some cameras, but what do you ask for all that it does? This is cheaper than Panasonic and Sanyo equivalent camcorders, the tiny ones also with pistol grip.
Those hoping for video quality on par with an HD camcorder are looking in the noxious area.
Personally, I assume the videos and level-headed shots are stunning for this type of blueprint. The clips and photos I choose with the TX1 aren't being broadcast, and they're not going in magazines. So for what I need, it's perfect. Actually, the video quality is better than my (older) MiniDV camcorder. And the truth is, I never expend that older DV camcorder anymore. With my mature camcorder I didn't like watching unedited clips from the machine itself, so I had to tranfer them to my computer, which was cumbersome. The clips from the TX1, while gigantic, transfer via USB, so that's faster than the DV transfer. And like I mentioned, better report quality. I've already ancient the TX1 more in the past 14 days than I have ragged my DV camera in the past two years. When I want to "serious" pictures I haul my D200 and lenses. If you want to assume "serious" video, choose something dedicated, which will be more expensive.
As for photo quality, I have not printed anything, but viewing it on my computer, the pictures seem on par with other point-and-shoot shots. There is fuzziness and focus searching in grievous light conditions, but that's what I've advance to question with point-and-shoots; they're inherently shrimp machines.
One last thing, you can zoom while shooting video in the highest quality; you can zoom in any video setting for that matter.
